Not all contracts need to be in writing. In fact, it would be impractical for some contracts to be in writing. Imagine creating and signing a written contract every time you go for a haircut. It would be time-consuming and impractical.
The law recognises that it would be silly to require all contracts be in writing. This is why legally-binding contracts can be implied, oral, or written. The type of contract required depends upon the circumstances.
An implied contract is made when little or no discussion takes place regarding the content of the contract. The contract’s content is implied by the actions of the parties.
For example, depositing coins into a Coke machine is an implied contract. While no discussion between you and the Coca-Cola Company has taken place, it is apparent that you should get a can of Coke when you deposit the coins.
Getting onto a bus and depositing the fare is also an example of an implied contract. While no negotiation takes place between you and the bus driver, it is apparent that the bus will provide you with transportation.
An oral contract is created when two parties engage in a discussion of terms and then come to a verbal agreement.
For example, imagine asking your friend if she will repaint your bike for $25. She responds yes, but only if you purchase the paint for her. You agree to the terms, and create an oral contract.
Just like a written contract, you should be sure to understand all of the terms that are included in the agreement. Oral contracts are legally enforceable. However, if you have to take the other party to court, you will have to prove the terms of the contract. This may be difficult if the agreement is not in writing.
By law, certain contracts need to be in writing to be enforceable.
For example, in Saskatchewan sales contracts between private buyers and businesses for more than $50 need to be in writing for the following purchases:
There are several other types of contracts that need to be in writing to be enforceable. These contracts are spelled out in the Statute of Frauds, a law that was enacted in 1677 by the English Parliament.
The Statutes of Frauds, originally called An Act for the prevention of Frauds and Perjuryes, was created because England’s Court of Common Pleas became overwhelmed with dubious cases about oral contracts. Litigants sometimes hired so-called “witnesses” to make up testimony, and the cases often turned into screaming matches. The court was left trying to determine who said what to whom. England’s parliament recognised that many of these problems could be stopped by legislating that particular contracts needed to be in writing.
According to the Statute of Frauds, contracts that need to be in writing to be enforceable include:
Broadly, these rules are still in effect in most Canadian provinces.
Decide whether or not the following contracts can be oral, or need to be in writing.